CJEM Articles: Garnet E. Cummings

Displaying 1-3 of 3 results

  • March 2007 9 2
    Damon C. Mayes, Garnet E. Cummings

    Objectives: There is controversy over who should serve as the Trauma Team Leader (TTL) at trauma-receiving centres. This study compared survival and emergency department (ED) length-of-stay between patients cared for by 3 different groups of TTLs: surgeons, emergency physicians (EPs) on call for trauma cases and EPs on shift in the ED.

    Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study involving all adult major blunt trauma patients (aged 17 and older) who were admitted to 2 level I trauma centres and who were entered into a provincial Trauma Registry between March 2000 and April 2002. The study was designed to compare the effect of TTL-type on survival and ED length-of-stay, while controlling for sex, age, and trauma severity as defined by the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and the Revised Trauma Score (RTS). Analysis was performed using linear regression modeling (for the ED lenght-of-stay outcome variable), and logistic regression modeling (for the surivial outcome variable).

    Results: There were 1412 patients enrolled in the study. The study population comprised 74% men and 26% women, with a mean age of 44.7 years (43.1, 46.6 and 42.8 years for surgeons, on-call EPs and on-shift EPs, respectively). The overall mean ISS was 23.2 (23.7 for surgeons, 22.9 for on-call EPs and 23.3 for on-shift EPs) and the overall average RTS was 7.6 (7.6 for surgeons, 7.6 for on-call EPs and 7.5 for on-shift EPs). The overall median ED length-of-stay was 5.3 hours (4.5, 5.3 and 5.6 hours for surgeons, on-call EPs and on-shift EPs, respectively; p = 0.07) and the overall survival was 87% (86% surgeon, 88% on-call EP, 87% on-shift EP; p = 0.08). No statistically significant relationship was found between TTL-type and ED length-of-stay (p = 0.42) or survival (p = 0.43) using multivariate modeling.

    Conclusion: Our results suggest that surgeons, on-call EPs, or on-shift EPs can act as the TTL without a negative impact on patient survival or ED length-of-stay.

  • November 2005 7 6
    Francesco Della Corte, Garnet E. Cummings, Greta G. Cummings

    Objective: To describe disaster medicine (DM) education in 16 Canadian medical schools before and after September 11, 2001 (9/11).
    Methods: Email invitations and reminders to complete an Internet-based survey were sent to 48 undergraduate and fellowship representatives.
    Results: A total of 24 responses were received from 15 of the 16 Canadian medical schools in operation at the time of the study, representing 10 undergraduate and 14 fellowship programs. Prior to 9/11, 22 programs at 9 schools taught DM compared with 14 programs post 9/11, a reduction of 37%. Six schools reported no DM teaching before 9/11; 7 reported no DM instruction after that date. Respondents from 12 schools felt that DM should be taught at the undergraduate level, and 9 of the 12 felt it should be included as core content. Respondents from all 15 responding schools felt that DM should be included as core content at the fellowship level. Twenty-two respondents (92%) indicated a belief that the public expects physicians to be prepared to deal with the consequences of disasters. The most frequently taught topics were emergency medical services and disasters, disaster management, hospital disaster planning, and bioterrorism.
    Conclusion: Despite support for DM instruction and increases in terrorism and global disasters, 46% of the responding medical schools do not teach this topic and there has been a downward trend in this regard since 9/11.

  • October 2000 2 4
    Carla Policicchio, Donald C. Voaklander, Garnet E. Cummings, Joanne Vincenten, Kim Borden

    Objectives: Our goal was to determine the effectiveness of an intervention aimed at improving the emergency department (ED) documentation of pediatric injuries.
    Methods: All physicians and nursing staff in the ED of an urban teaching hospital and trauma centre underwent focused injury surveillance training and were instructed how to document 14 injury-specific data elements. Pocket reminder cards were provided, and pediatric injury charts were flagged. Subsequently, random samples of pediatric injury charts were analyzed from a 3-month period prior to the intervention and from the corresponding months after the intervention. Post-intervention documentation was compared to pre-intervention documentation for the 14 pre-defined data elements.
    Results: Six of the 14 data elements were charted more frequently, and 2 less frequently during the post-intervention phase. Odds ratios ranged from 4.59 (95%CI, 3.40 to 6.19) for charting "the presence of an adult observer" to 0.09 (95%CI, 0.01 to 0.76) for charting "sports equipment related to the injury." The "flagging" of injury charts, as a visual reminder for clinicians to document injury data, seemed to be the most effective component of the intervention.
    Conclusion: A simple intervention, consisting of staff training, chart modification, and visual flagging of charts, can increase the amount of injury information documented by ED clinicians. Efforts to improve ED charting are most likely to succeed if they include visual prompts for clinicians.