CJEM Articles: Laurie Morrison

Displaying 1-9 of 9 results

  • January 2005 7 1
    Glen W. Bandiera, Laurie Morrison

    Background: Little is known about factors affecting emergency physician attendance at formal academic teaching sessions or what emergency physicians believe to be the benefits derived from attending these activities.

    Objectives: To determine what factors influence emergency medicine faculty attendance at formal academic rounds, what benefits they derive from attendance, and what differences in perceptions there are between full-time clinical and part-time clinical academic faculty.

    Methods: A survey was sent to all emergency physicians with academic appointments at one institution. Responses were tabulated dichotomously (yes/no) for checklist answers and analyzed using a 2-person grounded theory approach for open answers based on an a priori analysis plan. Differences between full-time and part-time faculty were compared using the chi-squared test for significance.

    Results: Response rate was 73.8% (48/65). Significant impediments to attendance included clinical responsibilities (75%), professional responsibilities (52.1%), personal responsibilities (33.3%), location (31.2%) and time (27.1%). Perceived benefits of attending rounds were: continuing medical education, social interaction, teaching opportunities, interaction with residents, comparing one's practice with peers, improving teaching techniques, and enjoyment of the format. There were no statistically significant differences between groups' responses.

    Conclusions: Emergency physicians in our study attend formal teaching sessions infrequently, suggesting that the perceived benefits do not outweigh impediments to attendance. The single main impediment, competing responsibilities, is difficult to modify for emergency physicians. Strategies to increase faculty attendance should focus on enhancing the main perceived benefits: continuing medical education, social interaction and educational development. Faculty learn from themselves and from residents during formal teaching sessions.

  • May 2002 4 3
    Andreas Laupacis, Brian Holroyd, Brian Rowe, Catherine M. Clement, Daniel Cass, Gary H. Greenberg, George A. Wells, Glen Bandiera, Howard Lesiuk, Iain MacPhail, Ian G. Stiell, James Worthington, Jonathan Dreyer, Laurie Morrison, Mark Reardon, Mary A. Eisenhauer, Michael Schull, R. Douglas McKnight, Richard Verbeek, Robert Brison

    Clinical prediction rules are decision-making tools that incorporate three or more variables from the history, physical examination or simple tests. They help clinicians make diagnostic or therapeutic decisions by standardizing the collection and interpretation of clinical data. There is growing interest in the methodological standards for their development and validation. This article describes the methods used to derive the Canadian C-Spine Rule and provides a valuable reference for investigators planning to develop future clinical prediction rules.

  • March 2002 4 2
    Andreas Laupacis, Brian Holroyd, Brian Rowe, Catherine M. Clement, Daniel Cass, Gary H. Greenberg, George A. Wells, Glen Bandiera, Howard Lesiuk, Iain MacPhail, Ian G. Stiell, James Worthington, Jonathan Dreyer, Laurie Morrison, Mark Reardon, Mary A. Eisenhauer, Michael Schull, R. Douglas McKnight, Richard Verbeek, Robert Brison

    This paper is Part I of a 2-part series to describe the background and methodology for the Canadian C-Spine Rule study to develop a clinical decision rule for rational imaging in alert and stable trauma patients. Current use of radiography is inefficient and variable, in part because there has been a lack of evidence-based guidelines to assist emergency physicians. Clinical decision rules are research-based decision-making tools that incorporate 3 or more variables from the history, physical examination or simple tests. The Canadian CT Head and C-Spine (CCC) Study is a large collaborative effort to develop clinical decision rules for the use of CT head in minor head injury and for the use of cervical spine radiography in alert and stable trauma victims. Part I details the background and rationale for the development of the Canadian C-Spine Rule. Part II will describe in detail the objectives and methods of the Canadian C-Spine Rule study.

  • October 2001 3 4
    Andrew Affleck, Brian Schwartz, David Petrie, Ed Cain, Laurie Morrison, Michael Murray, Richard Verbeek, Shawn Mawhinney
  • October 2001 3 4
    Andrew Affleck, Brian Schwartz, David Petrie, Ed Cain, Laurie Morrison, Michael Murray, Richard Verbeek, Shawn Mawhinney
  • October 2001 3 4
    Howard Ovens, Laurie Morrison, Matthew Cheung, P. Richard Verbeek
  • July 2001 3 3
    Jim Gall, Laurie Morrison, Matthew Cheung, P. Richard Verbeek
  • January 2001 3 1
    Laurie Morrison, Mathew Cheung, P. Richard Verbeek

    Objectives: National survival rates for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests are less than 5%, and substantial resources are associated with transporting cardiac arrest victims to hospital for emergency department (ED) resuscitation. The low overall survival rate and the identification of predictors of unsuccessful resuscitation have opened debate on the "futility" of transporting such patients to the ED. This study compares the costs of prehospital pronouncement of death to the costs of transporting patients to a hospital ED for physician pronouncement.
    Methods: The study was a retrospective chart review on a matched cohort of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Patients were included if documentation was adequate and ambulance response time was less than 8 minutes. A cohort of 20 patients pronounced dead in the field were matched to 20 patients pronounced dead in an ED. Cases were matched on 6 evidence-based predictors of unsuccessful resuscitation. Direct medical costs and mean physician and prehospital provider times were compared.
    Results: The total cost of pronouncement of death in the ED was $45.35 higher than the cost of field pronouncement (p < 0.001). Paramedics spent more time delivering care when death was pronounced in the field (83.3 vs. 55.9 min; p < 0.001). Base hospital physicians spent more time when patients were transported to hospital for ED pronouncement (16.3 vs. 4.3 min; p < 0.001). Total provider time for field pronouncement was 15.5 min longer (p = 0.004), but field pronouncement consumed 12.0 min less physician time.
    Conclusions: Paramedic pronouncement of death in the field is less costly than transporting patients to hospital for physician pronouncement. Pronouncement in the field requires more paramedic time but less physician time.

  • April 1999 1 1
    Catharine Sellens, Laurie Morrison

    A 9-year-old girl accidentally injected her right thumb with an adult dose of epinephrine through an auto-injector syringe, delivering 0.3 mg of 1:1000 epinephrine. This injection caused immediate ischemic changes in the digit. This is the first reported case of accidental self injection by a child of an adult dose of epinephrine and its successful treatment with low-dose phentolamine simultaneously infiltrated directly into the puncture area and along the course of the digital artery. The use of phentolamine as a specific competitive alpha-adrenergic antagonist to epinephrine has been well documented in adults and animal models. This report compares the management of a pediatric case to that of all reported adult cases of accidental subcutaneous epinephrine injections. This case suggests a pattern of infiltration with low-dose phentolamine that may be the most effective form of treatment for this condition in a patient of any age.