CJEM Articles: Richard Verbeek

Displaying 1-5 of 5 results

  • Effect of online medical control on prehospital Code Stroke triage
    March 2010 12 2
    Aikta Verma, David J. Gladstone, Jiming Fang, Jordan Chenkin, Richard Verbeek, Sandra E. Black

    Objective: Prehospital Code Stroke triage has the potential to overwhelm stroke centres by falsely identifying patients as eli gible for fibrinolysis. We sought to determine whether online medical control (whereby paramedics contact the medical control physician before a Code Stroke triage is assigned) reduced the proportion of false-positive Code Stroke patients.

    Methods: Following the introduction of a protocol for prehospi tal Code Stroke triage in an urban centre, online medical control alternated with off-line medical control (whereby paramedics implement Code Stroke triage independently) over 4 discreet intervals. We reviewed data for patients triaged to 3 regional stroke centres to compare the proportion of false-positive Code Stroke patients during online versus off-line medical control. We predefined false positives as patients triaged as Code Stroke who had symptoms discovered on awakening, were last seen in their usual state of health greater than 2 hours before assess ment or had a final diagnosis other than stroke.

    Results: The proportion of false positives was lower during online medical control (31% v. 42%, p = 0.003). This was explained by a lower proportion of patients whose symptoms were discovered on awakening (8% v. 14%, p < 0.001) and who were last seen in their usual state of health greater than 2 hours before assessment (22% v. 32%, p = 0.005). A final diagnosis of stroke was similar in the 2 groups (77% v. 79%, p = 0.39), as was the proportion of patients receiving fibrinol ysis (35% v. 33%, p = 0.72). Eighteen percent of patients were denied Code Stroke triage during online control, most com monly because of the time of symptom onset.

    Conclusion: Online medical control is associated with a reduced proportion of false-positive Code Stroke triage.

  • Canadian C-Spine Rule study for alert and stable trauma patients: II. Study objectives and methodology
    May 2002 4 3
    Andreas Laupacis, Brian Holroyd, Brian Rowe, Catherine M. Clement, Daniel Cass, Gary H. Greenberg, George A. Wells, Glen Bandiera, Howard Lesiuk, Iain MacPhail, Ian G. Stiell, James Worthington, Jonathan Dreyer, Laurie Morrison, Mark Reardon, Mary A. Eisenhauer, Michael Schull, R. Douglas McKnight, Richard Verbeek, Robert Brison

    Clinical prediction rules are decision-making tools that incorporate three or more variables from the history, physical examination or simple tests. They help clinicians make diagnostic or therapeutic decisions by standardizing the collection and interpretation of clinical data. There is growing interest in the methodological standards for their development and validation. This article describes the methods used to derive the Canadian C-Spine Rule and provides a valuable reference for investigators planning to develop future clinical prediction rules.

  • Canadian C-Spine Rule study for alert and stable trauma patients: I. Background and rationale
    March 2002 4 2
    Andreas Laupacis, Brian Holroyd, Brian Rowe, Catherine M. Clement, Daniel Cass, Gary H. Greenberg, George A. Wells, Glen Bandiera, Howard Lesiuk, Iain MacPhail, Ian G. Stiell, James Worthington, Jonathan Dreyer, Laurie Morrison, Mark Reardon, Mary A. Eisenhauer, Michael Schull, R. Douglas McKnight, Richard Verbeek, Robert Brison

    This paper is Part I of a 2-part series to describe the background and methodology for the Canadian C-Spine Rule study to develop a clinical decision rule for rational imaging in alert and stable trauma patients. Current use of radiography is inefficient and variable, in part because there has been a lack of evidence-based guidelines to assist emergency physicians. Clinical decision rules are research-based decision-making tools that incorporate 3 or more variables from the history, physical examination or simple tests. The Canadian CT Head and C-Spine (CCC) Study is a large collaborative effort to develop clinical decision rules for the use of CT head in minor head injury and for the use of cervical spine radiography in alert and stable trauma victims. Part I details the background and rationale for the development of the Canadian C-Spine Rule. Part II will describe in detail the objectives and methods of the Canadian C-Spine Rule study.

  • Public access defibrillation programs
    October 2001 3 4
    Andrew Affleck, Brian Schwartz, David Petrie, Ed Cain, Laurie Morrison, Michael Murray, Richard Verbeek, Shawn Mawhinney
  • Programme d'accès public à la défibrillation
    October 2001 3 4
    Andrew Affleck, Brian Schwartz, David Petrie, Ed Cain, Laurie Morrison, Michael Murray, Richard Verbeek, Shawn Mawhinney