CJEM Articles: atrial fibrillation

Displaying 1-3 of 3 results

  • May 2010 12 3
    Catherine M. Clement, Cheryl Symington, Christian Vaillancourt, David Birnie, Garth Dickinson, Ian G. Stiell, Jeffrey J. Perry, Martin S. Green

    Objective: There is no consensus on the optimal management of recent-onset episodes of atrial fibrillation or flutter. The approach to these conditions is particularly relevant in the current era of emergency department (ED) overcrowding. We sought to examine the effectiveness and safety of the Ottawa Aggressive Protocol to perform rapid cardioversion and discharge patients with these arrhythmias.

    Methods: This cohort study enrolled consecutive patient visits to an adult university hospital ED for recent-onset atrial fibrillation or flutter managed with the Ottawa Aggressive Protocol. The protocol includes intravenous chemical cardioversion, electrical cardioversion if necessary and discharge home from the ED.

    Results: A total of 660 patient visits were included, 95.2% involving atrial fibrillation and 4.9% involving atrial flutter. The mean age of patients enrolled was 64.5 years. In total, 96.8% were discharged home and, of those, 93.3% were in sinus rhythm. All patients were initially administered intravenous procainamide, with a 58.3% conversion rate. A total of 243 patients underwent subsequent electrical cardioversion with a 91.7% success rate. Adverse events occurred in 7.6% of cases: hypotension 6.7%, bradycardia 0.3% and 7-day relapse 8.6%. There were no cases of torsades de pointes, stroke or death. The median lengths of stay in the ED were as follows: 4.9 hours overall, 3.9 hours for those undergoing conversion with procainamide and 6.5 hours for those requiring electrical conversion.

    Conclusion: This is the largest study to date to evaluate the Ottawa Aggressive Protocol, a unique approach to cardioversion for ED patients with recent-onset episodes of atrial fibrillation and flutter. Our data demonstrate that the Ottawa Aggressive Protocol is effective, safe and rapid, and has the potential to significantly reduce hospital admissions and expedite ED care.

  • September 2004 6 5
    Jeff Brubacher

    A previously healthy 73-year-old woman presented to hospital with acute atrial fibrillation. After intravenous procainamide failed to restore sinus rhythm, she was treated with 300 mg of oral propafenone and discharged with a prescription for propafenone and propranolol. Six hours later she took 150 mg of propafenone as prescribed. Within 1 hour she became dyspneic and collapsed. On arrival in hospital she was unconscious, with a wide complex tachycardia and no obtainable blood pressure. After defibrillation and lidocaine, she converted to a wide complex sinus rhythm, but remained profoundly hypotensive despite intravenous epinephrine and dopamine. Hypertonic sodium bicarbonate (HCO3) was administered and, shortly thereafter, her blood pressure increased, her QRS duration normalized and her clinical status improved dramatically. In this case of severe refractory propafenone-related cardiac toxicity, intravenous HCO3 led to a profound clinical improvement. Emergency physicians should be familiar with the syndrome of sodium-channel blocker poisoning and recognize the potentially important role of bicarbonate in its treatment.

  • November 2002 4 6
    Richard S. Slavik

    Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia seen in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). Pharmacological conversion of atrial fibrillation to normal sinus rhythm (NSR) may be a feasible management strategy in selected patients. Recent guidelines have recommended intravenous amiodarone, a class III antiarrhythmic agent, for the conversion of AF to NSR. The purpose of this review is to examine the published evidence for the efficacy of IV amiodarone for the acute conversion of AF to NSR in the ED. Currently available data from 11 randomized, controlled trials and 3 meta analyses do not support the use of conventional doses of IV amiodarone for acute conversion in the ED. High dose IV or combined IV and oral administration may be effective as early as 8 hours in patients with recent-onset AF of ¾48 hour duration in patients without contraindications to these high dose regimens. There are no data to support the use of IV amiodarone for acute conversion in patients with an ejection fraction of <40% or clinical heart failure, so its use in these scenarios should be limited to symptomatic patients who are refractory to electrical conversion. More well-designed studies are required to determine the role of IV amiodarone for the acute conversion of AF in the ED.